How People Read

September 15, 2003 ~ 09:03pm

"Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, olny taht the frist and lsat ltteres are at the rghit pcleas. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by ilstef, but the wrod as a wlohe."

Does anyone know the true original source of the above comment?

Re: How People Read

by: on: September 26, 2003 ~ 12:05pm

The University of British Columbia's Linguistics department presented the following counter example by a simple inversion of the internal characters of words. Obviously this is too hard to read:



"Anidroccg to crad cniyrrag lcitsiugnis planoissefors at an uemannd, utisreviny in Bsitirh Cibmuloa, and crartnoy to the duoibus cmials of the ueticnd rcraeseh, a slpmie, macinahcel ioisrevnn of ianretnl cretcarahs araepps sneiciffut to csufnoe the eadyrevy oekoolnr."

Reply to:

Title (required)

Name (required)

Email (required)

URL/Homepage

Your Comment (required)