Documentation / admin-guide / sysfs-rules.rst


Based on kernel version 5.8. Page generated on 2020-08-08 17:40 EST.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192
Rules on how to access information in sysfs
===========================================

The kernel-exported sysfs exports internal kernel implementation details
and depends on internal kernel structures and layout. It is agreed upon
by the kernel developers that the Linux kernel does not provide a stable
internal API. Therefore, there are aspects of the sysfs interface that
may not be stable across kernel releases.

To minimize the risk of breaking users of sysfs, which are in most cases
low-level userspace applications, with a new kernel release, the users
of sysfs must follow some rules to use an as-abstract-as-possible way to
access this filesystem. The current udev and HAL programs already
implement this and users are encouraged to plug, if possible, into the
abstractions these programs provide instead of accessing sysfs directly.

But if you really do want or need to access sysfs directly, please follow
the following rules and then your programs should work with future
versions of the sysfs interface.

- Do not use libsysfs
    It makes assumptions about sysfs which are not true. Its API does not
    offer any abstraction, it exposes all the kernel driver-core
    implementation details in its own API. Therefore it is not better than
    reading directories and opening the files yourself.
    Also, it is not actively maintained, in the sense of reflecting the
    current kernel development. The goal of providing a stable interface
    to sysfs has failed; it causes more problems than it solves. It
    violates many of the rules in this document.

- sysfs is always at ``/sys``
    Parsing ``/proc/mounts`` is a waste of time. Other mount points are a
    system configuration bug you should not try to solve. For test cases,
    possibly support a ``SYSFS_PATH`` environment variable to overwrite the
    application's behavior, but never try to search for sysfs. Never try
    to mount it, if you are not an early boot script.

- devices are only "devices"
    There is no such thing like class-, bus-, physical devices,
    interfaces, and such that you can rely on in userspace. Everything is
    just simply a "device". Class-, bus-, physical, ... types are just
    kernel implementation details which should not be expected by
    applications that look for devices in sysfs.

    The properties of a device are:

    - devpath (``/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-2/2-2:1.0``)

      - identical to the DEVPATH value in the event sent from the kernel
        at device creation and removal
      - the unique key to the device at that point in time
      - the kernel's path to the device directory without the leading
        ``/sys``, and always starting with a slash
      - all elements of a devpath must be real directories. Symlinks
        pointing to /sys/devices must always be resolved to their real
        target and the target path must be used to access the device.
        That way the devpath to the device matches the devpath of the
        kernel used at event time.
      - using or exposing symlink values as elements in a devpath string
        is a bug in the application

    - kernel name (``sda``, ``tty``, ``0000:00:1f.2``, ...)

      - a directory name, identical to the last element of the devpath
      - applications need to handle spaces and characters like ``!`` in
        the name

    - subsystem (``block``, ``tty``, ``pci``, ...)

      - simple string, never a path or a link
      - retrieved by reading the "subsystem"-link and using only the
        last element of the target path

    - driver (``tg3``, ``ata_piix``, ``uhci_hcd``)

      - a simple string, which may contain spaces, never a path or a
        link
      - it is retrieved by reading the "driver"-link and using only the
        last element of the target path
      - devices which do not have "driver"-link just do not have a
        driver; copying the driver value in a child device context is a
        bug in the application

    - attributes

      - the files in the device directory or files below subdirectories
        of the same device directory
      - accessing attributes reached by a symlink pointing to another device,
        like the "device"-link, is a bug in the application

    Everything else is just a kernel driver-core implementation detail
    that should not be assumed to be stable across kernel releases.

- Properties of parent devices never belong into a child device.
    Always look at the parent devices themselves for determining device
    context properties. If the device ``eth0`` or ``sda`` does not have a
    "driver"-link, then this device does not have a driver. Its value is empty.
    Never copy any property of the parent-device into a child-device. Parent
    device properties may change dynamically without any notice to the
    child device.

- Hierarchy in a single device tree
    There is only one valid place in sysfs where hierarchy can be examined
    and this is below: ``/sys/devices.``
    It is planned that all device directories will end up in the tree
    below this directory.

- Classification by subsystem
    There are currently three places for classification of devices:
    ``/sys/block,`` ``/sys/class`` and ``/sys/bus.`` It is planned that these will
    not contain any device directories themselves, but only flat lists of
    symlinks pointing to the unified ``/sys/devices`` tree.
    All three places have completely different rules on how to access
    device information. It is planned to merge all three
    classification directories into one place at ``/sys/subsystem``,
    following the layout of the bus directories. All buses and
    classes, including the converted block subsystem, will show up
    there.
    The devices belonging to a subsystem will create a symlink in the
    "devices" directory at ``/sys/subsystem/<name>/devices``,

    If ``/sys/subsystem`` exists, ``/sys/bus``, ``/sys/class`` and ``/sys/block``
    can be ignored. If it does not exist, you always have to scan all three
    places, as the kernel is free to move a subsystem from one place to
    the other, as long as the devices are still reachable by the same
    subsystem name.

    Assuming ``/sys/class/<subsystem>`` and ``/sys/bus/<subsystem>``, or
    ``/sys/block`` and ``/sys/class/block`` are not interchangeable is a bug in
    the application.

- Block
    The converted block subsystem at ``/sys/class/block`` or
    ``/sys/subsystem/block`` will contain the links for disks and partitions
    at the same level, never in a hierarchy. Assuming the block subsystem to
    contain only disks and not partition devices in the same flat list is
    a bug in the application.

- "device"-link and <subsystem>:<kernel name>-links
    Never depend on the "device"-link. The "device"-link is a workaround
    for the old layout, where class devices are not created in
    ``/sys/devices/`` like the bus devices. If the link-resolving of a
    device directory does not end in ``/sys/devices/``, you can use the
    "device"-link to find the parent devices in ``/sys/devices/``, That is the
    single valid use of the "device"-link; it must never appear in any
    path as an element. Assuming the existence of the "device"-link for
    a device in ``/sys/devices/`` is a bug in the application.
    Accessing ``/sys/class/net/eth0/device`` is a bug in the application.

    Never depend on the class-specific links back to the ``/sys/class``
    directory.  These links are also a workaround for the design mistake
    that class devices are not created in ``/sys/devices.`` If a device
    directory does not contain directories for child devices, these links
    may be used to find the child devices in ``/sys/class.`` That is the single
    valid use of these links; they must never appear in any path as an
    element. Assuming the existence of these links for devices which are
    real child device directories in the ``/sys/devices`` tree is a bug in
    the application.

    It is planned to remove all these links when all class device
    directories live in ``/sys/devices.``

- Position of devices along device chain can change.
    Never depend on a specific parent device position in the devpath,
    or the chain of parent devices. The kernel is free to insert devices into
    the chain. You must always request the parent device you are looking for
    by its subsystem value. You need to walk up the chain until you find
    the device that matches the expected subsystem. Depending on a specific
    position of a parent device or exposing relative paths using ``../`` to
    access the chain of parents is a bug in the application.

- When reading and writing sysfs device attribute files, avoid dependency
    on specific error codes wherever possible. This minimizes coupling to
    the error handling implementation within the kernel.

    In general, failures to read or write sysfs device attributes shall
    propagate errors wherever possible. Common errors include, but are not
    limited to:

	``-EIO``: The read or store operation is not supported, typically
	returned by the sysfs system itself if the read or store pointer
	is ``NULL``.

	``-ENXIO``: The read or store operation failed

    Error codes will not be changed without good reason, and should a change
    to error codes result in user-space breakage, it will be fixed, or the
    the offending change will be reverted.

    Userspace applications can, however, expect the format and contents of
    the attribute files to remain consistent in the absence of a version
    attribute change in the context of a given attribute.