Based on kernel version 4.16.1. Page generated on 2018-04-09 11:53 EST.
1 System Suspend and Device Interrupts 2 3 Copyright (C) 2014 Intel Corp. 4 Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <email@example.com> 5 6 7 Suspending and Resuming Device IRQs 8 ----------------------------------- 9 10 Device interrupt request lines (IRQs) are generally disabled during system 11 suspend after the "late" phase of suspending devices (that is, after all of the 12 ->prepare, ->suspend and ->suspend_late callbacks have been executed for all 13 devices). That is done by suspend_device_irqs(). 14 15 The rationale for doing so is that after the "late" phase of device suspend 16 there is no legitimate reason why any interrupts from suspended devices should 17 trigger and if any devices have not been suspended properly yet, it is better to 18 block interrupts from them anyway. Also, in the past we had problems with 19 interrupt handlers for shared IRQs that device drivers implementing them were 20 not prepared for interrupts triggering after their devices had been suspended. 21 In some cases they would attempt to access, for example, memory address spaces 22 of suspended devices and cause unpredictable behavior to ensue as a result. 23 Unfortunately, such problems are very difficult to debug and the introduction 24 of suspend_device_irqs(), along with the "noirq" phase of device suspend and 25 resume, was the only practical way to mitigate them. 26 27 Device IRQs are re-enabled during system resume, right before the "early" phase 28 of resuming devices (that is, before starting to execute ->resume_early 29 callbacks for devices). The function doing that is resume_device_irqs(). 30 31 32 The IRQF_NO_SUSPEND Flag 33 ------------------------ 34 35 There are interrupts that can legitimately trigger during the entire system 36 suspend-resume cycle, including the "noirq" phases of suspending and resuming 37 devices as well as during the time when nonboot CPUs are taken offline and 38 brought back online. That applies to timer interrupts in the first place, 39 but also to IPIs and to some other special-purpose interrupts. 40 41 The IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag is used to indicate that to the IRQ subsystem when 42 requesting a special-purpose interrupt. It causes suspend_device_irqs() to 43 leave the corresponding IRQ enabled so as to allow the interrupt to work as 44 expected during the suspend-resume cycle, but does not guarantee that the 45 interrupt will wake the system from a suspended state -- for such cases it is 46 necessary to use enable_irq_wake(). 47 48 Note that the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag affects the entire IRQ and not just one 49 user of it. Thus, if the IRQ is shared, all of the interrupt handlers installed 50 for it will be executed as usual after suspend_device_irqs(), even if the 51 IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag was not passed to request_irq() (or equivalent) by some of 52 the IRQ's users. For this reason, using IRQF_NO_SUSPEND and IRQF_SHARED at the 53 same time should be avoided. 54 55 56 System Wakeup Interrupts, enable_irq_wake() and disable_irq_wake() 57 ------------------------------------------------------------------ 58 59 System wakeup interrupts generally need to be configured to wake up the system 60 from sleep states, especially if they are used for different purposes (e.g. as 61 I/O interrupts) in the working state. 62 63 That may involve turning on a special signal handling logic within the platform 64 (such as an SoC) so that signals from a given line are routed in a different way 65 during system sleep so as to trigger a system wakeup when needed. For example, 66 the platform may include a dedicated interrupt controller used specifically for 67 handling system wakeup events. Then, if a given interrupt line is supposed to 68 wake up the system from sleep sates, the corresponding input of that interrupt 69 controller needs to be enabled to receive signals from the line in question. 70 After wakeup, it generally is better to disable that input to prevent the 71 dedicated controller from triggering interrupts unnecessarily. 72 73 The IRQ subsystem provides two helper functions to be used by device drivers for 74 those purposes. Namely, enable_irq_wake() turns on the platform's logic for 75 handling the given IRQ as a system wakeup interrupt line and disable_irq_wake() 76 turns that logic off. 77 78 Calling enable_irq_wake() causes suspend_device_irqs() to treat the given IRQ 79 in a special way. Namely, the IRQ remains enabled, by on the first interrupt 80 it will be disabled, marked as pending and "suspended" so that it will be 81 re-enabled by resume_device_irqs() during the subsequent system resume. Also 82 the PM core is notified about the event which causes the system suspend in 83 progress to be aborted (that doesn't have to happen immediately, but at one 84 of the points where the suspend thread looks for pending wakeup events). 85 86 This way every interrupt from a wakeup interrupt source will either cause the 87 system suspend currently in progress to be aborted or wake up the system if 88 already suspended. However, after suspend_device_irqs() interrupt handlers are 89 not executed for system wakeup IRQs. They are only executed for IRQF_NO_SUSPEND 90 IRQs at that time, but those IRQs should not be configured for system wakeup 91 using enable_irq_wake(). 92 93 94 Interrupts and Suspend-to-Idle 95 ------------------------------ 96 97 Suspend-to-idle (also known as the "freeze" sleep state) is a relatively new 98 system sleep state that works by idling all of the processors and waiting for 99 interrupts right after the "noirq" phase of suspending devices. 100 101 Of course, this means that all of the interrupts with the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag 102 set will bring CPUs out of idle while in that state, but they will not cause the 103 IRQ subsystem to trigger a system wakeup. 104 105 System wakeup interrupts, in turn, will trigger wakeup from suspend-to-idle in 106 analogy with what they do in the full system suspend case. The only difference 107 is that the wakeup from suspend-to-idle is signaled using the usual working 108 state interrupt delivery mechanisms and doesn't require the platform to use 109 any special interrupt handling logic for it to work. 110 111 112 IRQF_NO_SUSPEND and enable_irq_wake() 113 ------------------------------------- 114 115 There are very few valid reasons to use both enable_irq_wake() and the 116 IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag on the same IRQ, and it is never valid to use both for the 117 same device. 118 119 First of all, if the IRQ is not shared, the rules for handling IRQF_NO_SUSPEND 120 interrupts (interrupt handlers are invoked after suspend_device_irqs()) are 121 directly at odds with the rules for handling system wakeup interrupts (interrupt 122 handlers are not invoked after suspend_device_irqs()). 123 124 Second, both enable_irq_wake() and IRQF_NO_SUSPEND apply to entire IRQs and not 125 to individual interrupt handlers, so sharing an IRQ between a system wakeup 126 interrupt source and an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND interrupt source does not generally 127 make sense. 128 129 In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an 130 IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device driver 131 must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events (signalling 132 the latter to the core with pm_system_wakeup()), must use enable_irq_wake() to 133 ensure that the IRQ will function as a wakeup source, and must request the IRQ 134 with IRQF_COND_SUSPEND to tell the core that it meets these requirements. If 135 these requirements are not met, it is not valid to use IRQF_COND_SUSPEND.
Information is copyright its respective author. All material is available from the Linux Kernel Source distributed under a GPL License.