Based on kernel version 3.9. Page generated on 2013-05-02 23:06 EST.
1 relay interface (formerly relayfs) 2 ================================== 3 4 The relay interface provides a means for kernel applications to 5 efficiently log and transfer large quantities of data from the kernel 6 to userspace via user-defined 'relay channels'. 7 8 A 'relay channel' is a kernel->user data relay mechanism implemented 9 as a set of per-cpu kernel buffers ('channel buffers'), each 10 represented as a regular file ('relay file') in user space. Kernel 11 clients write into the channel buffers using efficient write 12 functions; these automatically log into the current cpu's channel 13 buffer. User space applications mmap() or read() from the relay files 14 and retrieve the data as it becomes available. The relay files 15 themselves are files created in a host filesystem, e.g. debugfs, and 16 are associated with the channel buffers using the API described below. 17 18 The format of the data logged into the channel buffers is completely 19 up to the kernel client; the relay interface does however provide 20 hooks which allow kernel clients to impose some structure on the 21 buffer data. The relay interface doesn't implement any form of data 22 filtering - this also is left to the kernel client. The purpose is to 23 keep things as simple as possible. 24 25 This document provides an overview of the relay interface API. The 26 details of the function parameters are documented along with the 27 functions in the relay interface code - please see that for details. 28 29 Semantics 30 ========= 31 32 Each relay channel has one buffer per CPU, each buffer has one or more 33 sub-buffers. Messages are written to the first sub-buffer until it is 34 too full to contain a new message, in which case it it is written to 35 the next (if available). Messages are never split across sub-buffers. 36 At this point, userspace can be notified so it empties the first 37 sub-buffer, while the kernel continues writing to the next. 38 39 When notified that a sub-buffer is full, the kernel knows how many 40 bytes of it are padding i.e. unused space occurring because a complete 41 message couldn't fit into a sub-buffer. Userspace can use this 42 knowledge to copy only valid data. 43 44 After copying it, userspace can notify the kernel that a sub-buffer 45 has been consumed. 46 47 A relay channel can operate in a mode where it will overwrite data not 48 yet collected by userspace, and not wait for it to be consumed. 49 50 The relay channel itself does not provide for communication of such 51 data between userspace and kernel, allowing the kernel side to remain 52 simple and not impose a single interface on userspace. It does 53 provide a set of examples and a separate helper though, described 54 below. 55 56 The read() interface both removes padding and internally consumes the 57 read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being used to drain 58 the channel buffers, special-purpose communication between kernel and 59 user isn't necessary for basic operation. 60 61 One of the major goals of the relay interface is to provide a low 62 overhead mechanism for conveying kernel data to userspace. While the 63 read() interface is easy to use, it's not as efficient as the mmap() 64 approach; the example code attempts to make the tradeoff between the 65 two approaches as small as possible. 66 67 klog and relay-apps example code 68 ================================ 69 70 The relay interface itself is ready to use, but to make things easier, 71 a couple simple utility functions and a set of examples are provided. 72 73 The relay-apps example tarball, available on the relay sourceforge 74 site, contains a set of self-contained examples, each consisting of a 75 pair of .c files containing boilerplate code for each of the user and 76 kernel sides of a relay application. When combined these two sets of 77 boilerplate code provide glue to easily stream data to disk, without 78 having to bother with mundane housekeeping chores. 79 80 The 'klog debugging functions' patch (klog.patch in the relay-apps 81 tarball) provides a couple of high-level logging functions to the 82 kernel which allow writing formatted text or raw data to a channel, 83 regardless of whether a channel to write into exists or not, or even 84 whether the relay interface is compiled into the kernel or not. These 85 functions allow you to put unconditional 'trace' statements anywhere 86 in the kernel or kernel modules; only when there is a 'klog handler' 87 registered will data actually be logged (see the klog and kleak 88 examples for details). 89 90 It is of course possible to use the relay interface from scratch, 91 i.e. without using any of the relay-apps example code or klog, but 92 you'll have to implement communication between userspace and kernel, 93 allowing both to convey the state of buffers (full, empty, amount of 94 padding). The read() interface both removes padding and internally 95 consumes the read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being 96 used to drain the channel buffers, special-purpose communication 97 between kernel and user isn't necessary for basic operation. Things 98 such as buffer-full conditions would still need to be communicated via 99 some channel though. 100 101 klog and the relay-apps examples can be found in the relay-apps 102 tarball on http://relayfs.sourceforge.net 103 104 The relay interface user space API 105 ================================== 106 107 The relay interface implements basic file operations for user space 108 access to relay channel buffer data. Here are the file operations 109 that are available and some comments regarding their behavior: 110 111 open() enables user to open an _existing_ channel buffer. 112 113 mmap() results in channel buffer being mapped into the caller's 114 memory space. Note that you can't do a partial mmap - you 115 must map the entire file, which is NRBUF * SUBBUFSIZE. 116 117 read() read the contents of a channel buffer. The bytes read are 118 'consumed' by the reader, i.e. they won't be available 119 again to subsequent reads. If the channel is being used 120 in no-overwrite mode (the default), it can be read at any 121 time even if there's an active kernel writer. If the 122 channel is being used in overwrite mode and there are 123 active channel writers, results may be unpredictable - 124 users should make sure that all logging to the channel has 125 ended before using read() with overwrite mode. Sub-buffer 126 padding is automatically removed and will not be seen by 127 the reader. 128 129 sendfile() transfer data from a channel buffer to an output file 130 descriptor. Sub-buffer padding is automatically removed 131 and will not be seen by the reader. 132 133 poll() POLLIN/POLLRDNORM/POLLERR supported. User applications are 134 notified when sub-buffer boundaries are crossed. 135 136 close() decrements the channel buffer's refcount. When the refcount 137 reaches 0, i.e. when no process or kernel client has the 138 buffer open, the channel buffer is freed. 139 140 In order for a user application to make use of relay files, the 141 host filesystem must be mounted. For example, 142 143 mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug 144 145 NOTE: the host filesystem doesn't need to be mounted for kernel 146 clients to create or use channels - it only needs to be 147 mounted when user space applications need access to the buffer 148 data. 149 150 151 The relay interface kernel API 152 ============================== 153 154 Here's a summary of the API the relay interface provides to in-kernel clients: 155 156 TBD(curr. line MT:/API/) 157 channel management functions: 158 159 relay_open(base_filename, parent, subbuf_size, n_subbufs, 160 callbacks, private_data) 161 relay_close(chan) 162 relay_flush(chan) 163 relay_reset(chan) 164 165 channel management typically called on instigation of userspace: 166 167 relay_subbufs_consumed(chan, cpu, subbufs_consumed) 168 169 write functions: 170 171 relay_write(chan, data, length) 172 __relay_write(chan, data, length) 173 relay_reserve(chan, length) 174 175 callbacks: 176 177 subbuf_start(buf, subbuf, prev_subbuf, prev_padding) 178 buf_mapped(buf, filp) 179 buf_unmapped(buf, filp) 180 create_buf_file(filename, parent, mode, buf, is_global) 181 remove_buf_file(dentry) 182 183 helper functions: 184 185 relay_buf_full(buf) 186 subbuf_start_reserve(buf, length) 187 188 189 Creating a channel 190 ------------------ 191 192 relay_open() is used to create a channel, along with its per-cpu 193 channel buffers. Each channel buffer will have an associated file 194 created for it in the host filesystem, which can be and mmapped or 195 read from in user space. The files are named basename0...basenameN-1 196 where N is the number of online cpus, and by default will be created 197 in the root of the filesystem (if the parent param is NULL). If you 198 want a directory structure to contain your relay files, you should 199 create it using the host filesystem's directory creation function, 200 e.g. debugfs_create_dir(), and pass the parent directory to 201 relay_open(). Users are responsible for cleaning up any directory 202 structure they create, when the channel is closed - again the host 203 filesystem's directory removal functions should be used for that, 204 e.g. debugfs_remove(). 205 206 In order for a channel to be created and the host filesystem's files 207 associated with its channel buffers, the user must provide definitions 208 for two callback functions, create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file(). 209 create_buf_file() is called once for each per-cpu buffer from 210 relay_open() and allows the user to create the file which will be used 211 to represent the corresponding channel buffer. The callback should 212 return the dentry of the file created to represent the channel buffer. 213 remove_buf_file() must also be defined; it's responsible for deleting 214 the file(s) created in create_buf_file() and is called during 215 relay_close(). 216 217 Here are some typical definitions for these callbacks, in this case 218 using debugfs: 219 220 /* 221 * create_buf_file() callback. Creates relay file in debugfs. 222 */ 223 static struct dentry *create_buf_file_handler(const char *filename, 224 struct dentry *parent, 225 int mode, 226 struct rchan_buf *buf, 227 int *is_global) 228 { 229 return debugfs_create_file(filename, mode, parent, buf, 230 &relay_file_operations); 231 } 232 233 /* 234 * remove_buf_file() callback. Removes relay file from debugfs. 235 */ 236 static int remove_buf_file_handler(struct dentry *dentry) 237 { 238 debugfs_remove(dentry); 239 240 return 0; 241 } 242 243 /* 244 * relay interface callbacks 245 */ 246 static struct rchan_callbacks relay_callbacks = 247 { 248 .create_buf_file = create_buf_file_handler, 249 .remove_buf_file = remove_buf_file_handler, 250 }; 251 252 And an example relay_open() invocation using them: 253 254 chan = relay_open("cpu", NULL, SUBBUF_SIZE, N_SUBBUFS, &relay_callbacks, NULL); 255 256 If the create_buf_file() callback fails, or isn't defined, channel 257 creation and thus relay_open() will fail. 258 259 The total size of each per-cpu buffer is calculated by multiplying the 260 number of sub-buffers by the sub-buffer size passed into relay_open(). 261 The idea behind sub-buffers is that they're basically an extension of 262 double-buffering to N buffers, and they also allow applications to 263 easily implement random-access-on-buffer-boundary schemes, which can 264 be important for some high-volume applications. The number and size 265 of sub-buffers is completely dependent on the application and even for 266 the same application, different conditions will warrant different 267 values for these parameters at different times. Typically, the right 268 values to use are best decided after some experimentation; in general, 269 though, it's safe to assume that having only 1 sub-buffer is a bad 270 idea - you're guaranteed to either overwrite data or lose events 271 depending on the channel mode being used. 272 273 The create_buf_file() implementation can also be defined in such a way 274 as to allow the creation of a single 'global' buffer instead of the 275 default per-cpu set. This can be useful for applications interested 276 mainly in seeing the relative ordering of system-wide events without 277 the need to bother with saving explicit timestamps for the purpose of 278 merging/sorting per-cpu files in a postprocessing step. 279 280 To have relay_open() create a global buffer, the create_buf_file() 281 implementation should set the value of the is_global outparam to a 282 non-zero value in addition to creating the file that will be used to 283 represent the single buffer. In the case of a global buffer, 284 create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file() will be called only once. The 285 normal channel-writing functions, e.g. relay_write(), can still be 286 used - writes from any cpu will transparently end up in the global 287 buffer - but since it is a global buffer, callers should make sure 288 they use the proper locking for such a buffer, either by wrapping 289 writes in a spinlock, or by copying a write function from relay.h and 290 creating a local version that internally does the proper locking. 291 292 The private_data passed into relay_open() allows clients to associate 293 user-defined data with a channel, and is immediately available 294 (including in create_buf_file()) via chan->private_data or 295 buf->chan->private_data. 296 297 Buffer-only channels 298 -------------------- 299 300 These channels have no files associated and can be created with 301 relay_open(NULL, NULL, ...). Such channels are useful in scenarios such 302 as when doing early tracing in the kernel, before the VFS is up. In these 303 cases, one may open a buffer-only channel and then call 304 relay_late_setup_files() when the kernel is ready to handle files, 305 to expose the buffered data to the userspace. 306 307 Channel 'modes' 308 --------------- 309 310 relay channels can be used in either of two modes - 'overwrite' or 311 'no-overwrite'. The mode is entirely determined by the implementation 312 of the subbuf_start() callback, as described below. The default if no 313 subbuf_start() callback is defined is 'no-overwrite' mode. If the 314 default mode suits your needs, and you plan to use the read() 315 interface to retrieve channel data, you can ignore the details of this 316 section, as it pertains mainly to mmap() implementations. 317 318 In 'overwrite' mode, also known as 'flight recorder' mode, writes 319 continuously cycle around the buffer and will never fail, but will 320 unconditionally overwrite old data regardless of whether it's actually 321 been consumed. In no-overwrite mode, writes will fail, i.e. data will 322 be lost, if the number of unconsumed sub-buffers equals the total 323 number of sub-buffers in the channel. It should be clear that if 324 there is no consumer or if the consumer can't consume sub-buffers fast 325 enough, data will be lost in either case; the only difference is 326 whether data is lost from the beginning or the end of a buffer. 327 328 As explained above, a relay channel is made of up one or more 329 per-cpu channel buffers, each implemented as a circular buffer 330 subdivided into one or more sub-buffers. Messages are written into 331 the current sub-buffer of the channel's current per-cpu buffer via the 332 write functions described below. Whenever a message can't fit into 333 the current sub-buffer, because there's no room left for it, the 334 client is notified via the subbuf_start() callback that a switch to a 335 new sub-buffer is about to occur. The client uses this callback to 1) 336 initialize the next sub-buffer if appropriate 2) finalize the previous 337 sub-buffer if appropriate and 3) return a boolean value indicating 338 whether or not to actually move on to the next sub-buffer. 339 340 To implement 'no-overwrite' mode, the userspace client would provide 341 an implementation of the subbuf_start() callback something like the 342 following: 343 344 static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf, 345 void *subbuf, 346 void *prev_subbuf, 347 unsigned int prev_padding) 348 { 349 if (prev_subbuf) 350 *((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding; 351 352 if (relay_buf_full(buf)) 353 return 0; 354 355 subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int)); 356 357 return 1; 358 } 359 360 If the current buffer is full, i.e. all sub-buffers remain unconsumed, 361 the callback returns 0 to indicate that the buffer switch should not 362 occur yet, i.e. until the consumer has had a chance to read the 363 current set of ready sub-buffers. For the relay_buf_full() function 364 to make sense, the consumer is responsible for notifying the relay 365 interface when sub-buffers have been consumed via 366 relay_subbufs_consumed(). Any subsequent attempts to write into the 367 buffer will again invoke the subbuf_start() callback with the same 368 parameters; only when the consumer has consumed one or more of the 369 ready sub-buffers will relay_buf_full() return 0, in which case the 370 buffer switch can continue. 371 372 The implementation of the subbuf_start() callback for 'overwrite' mode 373 would be very similar: 374 375 static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf, 376 void *subbuf, 377 void *prev_subbuf, 378 unsigned int prev_padding) 379 { 380 if (prev_subbuf) 381 *((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding; 382 383 subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int)); 384 385 return 1; 386 } 387 388 In this case, the relay_buf_full() check is meaningless and the 389 callback always returns 1, causing the buffer switch to occur 390 unconditionally. It's also meaningless for the client to use the 391 relay_subbufs_consumed() function in this mode, as it's never 392 consulted. 393 394 The default subbuf_start() implementation, used if the client doesn't 395 define any callbacks, or doesn't define the subbuf_start() callback, 396 implements the simplest possible 'no-overwrite' mode, i.e. it does 397 nothing but return 0. 398 399 Header information can be reserved at the beginning of each sub-buffer 400 by calling the subbuf_start_reserve() helper function from within the 401 subbuf_start() callback. This reserved area can be used to store 402 whatever information the client wants. In the example above, room is 403 reserved in each sub-buffer to store the padding count for that 404 sub-buffer. This is filled in for the previous sub-buffer in the 405 subbuf_start() implementation; the padding value for the previous 406 sub-buffer is passed into the subbuf_start() callback along with a 407 pointer to the previous sub-buffer, since the padding value isn't 408 known until a sub-buffer is filled. The subbuf_start() callback is 409 also called for the first sub-buffer when the channel is opened, to 410 give the client a chance to reserve space in it. In this case the 411 previous sub-buffer pointer passed into the callback will be NULL, so 412 the client should check the value of the prev_subbuf pointer before 413 writing into the previous sub-buffer. 414 415 Writing to a channel 416 -------------------- 417 418 Kernel clients write data into the current cpu's channel buffer using 419 relay_write() or __relay_write(). relay_write() is the main logging 420 function - it uses local_irqsave() to protect the buffer and should be 421 used if you might be logging from interrupt context. If you know 422 you'll never be logging from interrupt context, you can use 423 __relay_write(), which only disables preemption. These functions 424 don't return a value, so you can't determine whether or not they 425 failed - the assumption is that you wouldn't want to check a return 426 value in the fast logging path anyway, and that they'll always succeed 427 unless the buffer is full and no-overwrite mode is being used, in 428 which case you can detect a failed write in the subbuf_start() 429 callback by calling the relay_buf_full() helper function. 430 431 relay_reserve() is used to reserve a slot in a channel buffer which 432 can be written to later. This would typically be used in applications 433 that need to write directly into a channel buffer without having to 434 stage data in a temporary buffer beforehand. Because the actual write 435 may not happen immediately after the slot is reserved, applications 436 using relay_reserve() can keep a count of the number of bytes actually 437 written, either in space reserved in the sub-buffers themselves or as 438 a separate array. See the 'reserve' example in the relay-apps tarball 439 at http://relayfs.sourceforge.net for an example of how this can be 440 done. Because the write is under control of the client and is 441 separated from the reserve, relay_reserve() doesn't protect the buffer 442 at all - it's up to the client to provide the appropriate 443 synchronization when using relay_reserve(). 444 445 Closing a channel 446 ----------------- 447 448 The client calls relay_close() when it's finished using the channel. 449 The channel and its associated buffers are destroyed when there are no 450 longer any references to any of the channel buffers. relay_flush() 451 forces a sub-buffer switch on all the channel buffers, and can be used 452 to finalize and process the last sub-buffers before the channel is 453 closed. 454 455 Misc 456 ---- 457 458 Some applications may want to keep a channel around and re-use it 459 rather than open and close a new channel for each use. relay_reset() 460 can be used for this purpose - it resets a channel to its initial 461 state without reallocating channel buffer memory or destroying 462 existing mappings. It should however only be called when it's safe to 463 do so, i.e. when the channel isn't currently being written to. 464 465 Finally, there are a couple of utility callbacks that can be used for 466 different purposes. buf_mapped() is called whenever a channel buffer 467 is mmapped from user space and buf_unmapped() is called when it's 468 unmapped. The client can use this notification to trigger actions 469 within the kernel application, such as enabling/disabling logging to 470 the channel. 471 472 473 Resources 474 ========= 475 476 For news, example code, mailing list, etc. see the relay interface homepage: 477 478 http://relayfs.sourceforge.net 479 480 481 Credits 482 ======= 483 484 The ideas and specs for the relay interface came about as a result of 485 discussions on tracing involving the following: 486 487 Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca> 488 Richard Moore <richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com> 489 Bob Wisniewski <bob@watson.ibm.com> 490 Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com> 491 Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com> 492 493 Also thanks to Hubertus Franke for a lot of useful suggestions and bug 494 reports.